![]() ![]() For example, at the start of Book 3, Newton had defined a number of ‘Hypotheses’ governing his approach to natural phenomenon. 3990, allows scholars to obtain important information about Newton’s protracted reworking of the first edition. ![]() Adv.b.39.1, together with other sources such as the annotated copy of the Principia from Newton’s Library (Trinity College, shelfmark NQ.16.200) and the Liber Secundus Add. The cooperation between Newton and Cotes can be followed by reading their correspondence which is in part available at Cotes correspondence. Indeed, Section VII, Book II, was almost entirely rewritten, as well as the opening of Book III. ![]() The result was a collaboration that substantially improved the text of the Principia, despite the delays that were introduced by the realisation that several parts of Book II and Book III in particular needed further consideration. Bentley recommended, however, that Roger Cotes, the young Plumian Professor of astronomy in Cambridge, supervise the edition for Newton. At first, he proposed to look after the production of the Principia himself, but as its demands became more complicated he abandoned the work. Bentley was well aware of the difficulty that English compositors had in setting complex Latin texts and of the extra demands that this might impose on the author. He was now able to offer Newton freedom from the concerns that perhaps most bothered him about a new edition of his most important work: the trouble of finding suitable printers and the cost in terms of time of correcting and seeing the book through the press. Bentley had already managed to talk Newton into allowing William Whiston to edit and print a manuscript of his lectures on algebra, supposedly delivered in the 1670s and early 1680s. In 1708, Bentley persuaded Newton to allow him to prepare a specimen for this publication at the Cambridge University Press. A second edition of the Principia appeared to be one of these. Despite its considerable scholarly achievements, the new Press was not a financial success and Bentley and his collaborators remained on the lookout for suitable books that might turn a small profit. In the mid-1690s, Bentley had been instrumental in the establishment of the University Press in Cambridge under the direction of the Vice-Chancellor. Richard Bentley, who had been one of the first serious expositors of the Principia in the early 1690s, noticed that copies of the work were becoming increasing hard to find and fetched a high price. It seems that material concerns, as much as anything else, finally brought a second edition of the Principia to the press. During the 1690s, Newton seemed set on the production of a new edition of the Principia, yet despite the efforts of Nicolas Fatio de Duillier and David Gregory, it appeared that the second edition of the Principia was running into the sand. The project of amending the first edition of the Principia began quite early. Newton Papers : Philosophiæ naturalis principia mathematica Newton, Isaac, Sir, 1642-1727 Newton PapersĪ copy of the first edition of the Principia that Newton annotated in the margin and on interleaved sheets with his own amendments. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |